![]() |
why no definite article? in oxford dictionaries, I also find something: for understanding of sth & for use of sth I wonder why the English don't say: for the understanding of sth & for the use of sth could you answer my question? |
Re: why no definite article? It's not really possible to answer your question without seeing the expression in context. Can you cite the full sentences? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2