He is a writer fallen into oblivion HI, I've got a question and I hope you can help me.
I've found a sentence on the Internet: He is a writer fallen into oblivion.
usually I'll write sth in this way:
He is a writer who has fallen into oblivion.
And we know that in a sentence, WHO IS etc (but not WHO HAS/HAVE etc) can be left out.
what I've learned is that in early modern English, WHO IS (IS as an auxiliary verb) could be replaced by WHO HAS; but could WHO HAS be used in ellipsis?(just as the first sentence I have quoted?) |