Thread: 'for' as a conjunction to mean 'because', archaic?
View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Unread Jan 25th, 2010, 01:51 am
mesmark mesmark is offline
eslHQ superstar!
  
Join Date: Mar 27th, 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,693
mesmark is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 'for' as a conjunction to mean 'because', archaic?
Sue - thanks! That certainly helps.

At the time I told her that I felt it didn't really match the style for I felt it a bit formal

I'll relay the rest next week.

Thanks again for taking the time to bounce this around.

- Mark
Reply With Quote